Attorney Frank Cassese, BetrasKopp legal team secure not guilty verdict for Marquaysha Driver in heart-wrenching case

Lead Defense Attorney Frank Cassese and Marquaysha Driver await the verdict in her trial on involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment charges related to the death of the sevey-year-old son De’Vonte Housley Jr. A Mahoning County Common Pleas jury acquitted Ms. Driver on October 23, 2025.

In one of the most emotionally charged and heart-wrenching cases to be tried in the area in decades, a Mahoning County Common Pleas Court jury found Marquaysha Driver not guilty of involuntary manslaughter and child endangerment charges that were filed against her in the wake of the Oct. 22, 2023, shooting death of her 7-year-old son, De’Vonte Housley Jr.

Attorney Frank Cassese who led Ms. Driver’s defense team, said the outcome clearly demonstrates the jury system’s capacity to render justice in extremely complicated and nuanced cases. “We were able to convince the jury to look beyond the letter of the law and grasp the fact that DeVonte’s death was not a crime, but a tragic accident that will haunt his mother, his siblings, and his entire family for the rest of their lives,” Attorney Cassese said.

“I think Marquaysha’s testimony was the ultimate factor,” he continued. “I think she was very raw, very honest, very truthful. In my opinion that was something that really tipped the scales.” This was a tough case for the state of Ohio, a tough case for the defense, there’s a lot of emotion that goes into this, so it’s never easy,”

According to Attorney Cassese, Attorney Tallie Orengia, Paralegal Gena Safarek, Daniel Leslie, and Connor Hilton, played integral roles in preparing Ms.Driver’s defense and presenting it to the jury. “This was an extremely challenging case from both a legal and purely human standpoint because we were dealing with the death of a seven-year boy, it’s impact on his family, and the possibility that his mother could be incarcerated for ten years or more,” he said. “Their hard work, expertise, and commitment to the cause of justice along with the unmatched experience and knowledge the entire BetrasKopp legal team brings to every case is directly responsible for this verdict.”

Given its unique and compelling nature, Attorney Cassese and the BetrasKopp team will prepare and share an in-depth analysis of the case, including the evolution of the defense strategy and a behind-the-scenes look at the work involved in trying a serious felony case.

Local media coverage of the case may be accessed at these links:

https://www.vindy.com/news/local-news/2025/10/mother-found-not-guilty/

https://www.wfmj.com/clip/15519496/woman-found-not-guilty-of-7-year-olds-death

https://www.wkbn.com/news/local-news/youngstown-news/tried-to-do-the-right-thing-mother-charged-after-childs-shooting-death-testifies-in-her-own-defense/

We’re also pleased to reprint WKBN TV 27’s excellent report on the case:

A jury Thursday in Mahoning County Common Pleas Court found a woman whose 7-year-old son was shot and killed with a gun in her home not guilty of all charges.

After about two hours of deliberations, jurors found Marquaysha Driver, 31, not guilty of involuntary manslaughter and four counts of child endangering for the October 22, 2023, death of her son De’Vonte Housley, Jr., 7, in her East Marmion Avenue home.

De’Vonte was killed after he and his brother found a loaded gun on a mantle above a fireplace in her home.

Driver testified on her own behalf earlier Thursday about how she woke up to every parent’s worst nightmare

“I woke up to a pop,” she said as she was sobbing. “My son came running in the room. I asked, ‘What was that?’ and he was like, ‘I shot my brother.’”

Testimony began in her case Wednesday before Judge Anthony D’Apolito after a jury was seated Tuesday.

The state rested its case Wednesday, and the defense rested its case Thursday after Driver’s testimony. She was the only witness called by the defense.

Prosecutors say Driver was reckless because she knew a loaded handgun was in her home, yet did not take steps to keep it away from her children, one of whom ended up shooting another.

The gun belonged to her brother, who she accompanied two days before De’Vonte’s death to a Boardman sporting goods store, where he bought a shotgun and a 9mm pistol. Somehow, the pistol was left at her house.

Dressed in all black and talking in a slow, at times somber voice, Driver recounted the days leading up to De’Vonte’s death under direct examination from her attorney, Frank Cassese. The gallery was full of friends and relatives, who at times provided a steady backdrop of sniffles.

Driver said she is a hairdresser and she spent all of Saturday — the day before De’Vonte’s death — from 1 p.m. to 3 a.m. Sunday, doing hair in her home. She testified that the weekend was a big one, as Chaney and East high schools both had homecoming, and Sweetest Day fell on the same weekend.

She had late clients because some women were getting their hair done to go to a “bar party.” Her last client was a friend who was celebrating her birthday that Sunday.

When she was done about 3 a.m. Sunday, she began cleaning up, and as she did, she noticed the gun her brother bought on the mantle above the fireplace. She said she decided to push the gun further back on the mantle behind a 75-inch television. Demonstrating for the jury, she stood on the points of her toes and reached out an arm, saying she stuffed it so far back she could barely reach it when she was finished.

“When I couldn’t see it anymore, I thought it was OK,” she testified.

She also said she called her brother and told him to get the gun as soon as possible.

She then took a shower and fell into bed exhausted, still wrapped in a towel. She was that way when she was awakened by the gunshot that took De’Vonte’s life.

Prosecutors said in opening statements Wednesday that De’Vonte and his brother were watching television when they couldn’t change the channel, so they looked for batteries for the remote control, which were also on the mantle.

When the boys found the batteries, they also found the gun, prosecutors said, and began playing with it until it went off and De’Vonte was killed. Driver testified she put the batteries up because her youngest child liked to chew on them, so she tried to keep them out of the child’s reach.

She went downstairs, found De’Vonte and called 911.

“I just asked them how to resuscitate my son,” she said through tears.

Jurors also saw body camera video from Youngstown police Patrolman Anthony Congemi, who was called to the scene and testified Wednesday.

As members of the gallery began choking back sobs and silently crying, jurors watched through Congemi’s camera as he ran into the house, then ran back to his cruiser, grabbed a pair of gloves and went back inside.

Officer Kenneth Garling was trying to put a chest seal on the wound, and Driver, still wrapped in a towel, was in tears and screaming.

“Keep pressure on both sides,” someone can be heard saying.

“Is he breathing?” Congemi asks.

“I don’t know,” Driver answers through tears.

Congemi asks her where the gun is, and she tells him it is back on the mantle. De’Vonte is sprawled on the floor on his back, blood visible on his chest, wearing a pair of dark shorts with a white stripe down the side.

Some jurors seemed visibly shaken after the video was played. A pair of women in the jury box sat stone-faced for several minutes while an older man in the first row took off his glasses, held them and stared straight ahead.

Driver then began crying on the witness stand.

“I’m sorry,” she said. “It just hurts.”

Cassese coaxed her back to her testimony, getting her to tell of her visit the day after De’Vonte’s death to talk to detectives without a lawyer present, a visit she made on her own, she said.

Under cross-examination from Assistant Prosecutor Jennifer Paris, Driver said she did not recall telling detectives she knew the gun was loaded. She then watched video in the judge’s chambers of her interview with police, then said when testimony resumed, she did tell them she knew the gun was loaded.

When asked by Paris if she thought anyone could get the gun, Driver said no.

But, Paris said, they did.

“I don’t know how they did,” she said.

“But you agree they could have got it?” Paris asked.

“No.”

“But they did.”

“Yes,” Driver said. “But I don’t know how.”

She denied having the gun in her purse or that the gun had been in the house for a week.

“Do you acknowledge you left a loaded handgun in your house, unattended, with several small children in your house?” Paris asked.

“I tried my best to hide it,” she answered.

Paris asked her why she didn’t unload the gun, and Driver said she did not know how. Paris asked her why she didn’t call her brother. Paris also asked her why she didn’t put the gun outside or lock it in a car or in another room in the house.

“There’s nowhere to lock the gun in my house,” she said. “I just tried to do the right thing.”

After Driver’s testimony, jurors were given a break while the attorneys went over exhibits and the judge’s instructions to the jury.

Ruling by Judge Rice is major victory for former Ursuline student athletes, BetrasKopp vows to continue fighting for any player wrongfully denied the right to compete in football and other interscholastic sports

Trumbull County Common Pleas Court Judge Ronald Rice has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) that bars the Ohio High School Athletic Association (OHSAA) from enforcing a September 15 ruling that prohibits former Ursuline High School student athletes who were not involved in the alleged sexual abuse and hazing incidents that led to the cancellation of the school’s 2025 football season from transferring to and playing for other Ohio high schools.

Judge Rice granted the TRO in response to a lawsuit filed by Attorneys Brian Kopp and Frank Cassese of BetrasKopp Attorneys at Law on behalf of two former Ursuline players who transferred to Girard High School and sought to join that school’s football team immediately after Ursuline cancelled its season on September 12. The OHSAA’s September 15 ruling would prevent them from doing so.

In their motion for the TRO and during oral arguments, Attorneys Kopp and Cassese asserted that their clients would suffer irreparable harm if they are prohibited from playing football during the 2025 season. Judge Rice agreed:

Upon review of the Plaintiffs’ Verified Complaint and after hearing the oral arguments from Counsel, the Court finds that the process set forth by Defendant bylaws does not account for or contemplate Plaintiffs’ situation. To rigidly require Plaintiffs to attempt to seek relief through the currently stated bylaws, which do not account for the situation at hand, would be futile and would deprive Plaintiffs of any relief given the very short timeframe at issue. Plaintiffs most certainly will be irreparably harmed if they, as innocent parties, are prohibited from playing during the 2025 season as that is time that cannot be replaced or compensated. Any injury to third parties would be minimal compared to the irreparable injury that would be suffered by Plaintiffs. This is not typical situation of a student transferring schools midseason as contemplated by the OHSAA bylaws. This is an extremely unfortunate situation that was outside of Plaintiffs’ control. Lastly, the Court finds that public interest will be served in allowing these Plaintiffs to enjoy playing in the remainder of the 2025 football season at Girard High Scho I. These students should not have this time and opportunity taken away from them because of misconduct caused by third parties.

The TRO enjoins the OHSAA and its Executive Director David Ute from prohibiting the plaintiffs “…from participation in the remainder of the 2025 interscholastic athletic season and postseason tournaments at Girard High School or until further order of this Court.”

“Judge Rice understands that the OHSAA Bylaws completely failed to address the situation confronting innocent Ursuline High School football players,” Attorney Kopp said after the TRO was issued. “The court also recognized that the Ursuline players were subject to a flawed and futile process which unjustly denied them of their eligibility.  We are extremely pleased with the ruling, but we are not done.  We will continue to fight for any player who has been wrongfully denied his right to compete in football, a game which is part of the basic fabric of our town.” (May want to add region and state of Ohio here.)

In addition to the TRO, the plaintiffs are also seeking a preliminary injunction. A hearing on that matter will be held on October 15, 2025.

Click here to view/download BK’s verified complaint. Click here to view/download Judge Rice’s ruling.